| Indo-Pakistani War
of 1965 |

Map showing Indian administered Kashmir in shades of orange and
Pakistan held kashmir in green hues. |
| Date: |
August 15 - September
21, 1965 |
| Location: |
Indian subcontinent |
| Result: |
Stalemate, UN mandated
ceasefire. |
| Casus
belli: |
Pakistan backed
guerillas' infiltration into Jammu & Kashmir, India |
|
| Combatants |
| India |
Pakistan |
| Commanders |
| Lt
Gen Harbakhsh Singh |
Field Marshal Ayub
Khan |
| Casualties |
| 3,000
killed |
3,800 killed |
The Indo-Pakistani War
of 1965, also known as the Second Kashmir War, was the
culmination of a series of skirmishes that occurred between April 1965
and September 1965 between India and Pakistan. The war was the second
fought between India and Pakistan over the region of Kashmir, the first
having been fought in 1947. The war lasted five weeks, resulted in
thousands of casualties on both sides and ended in a United Nations (UN)
mandated ceasefire. It is generally accepted that the war began
following the failure of Pakistan's "Operation Gibraltar"
which was designed to infiltrate and invade Jammu and Kashmir.
Much of the war was fought
by the countries' land forces in the region of Kashmir and along the
International Border (IB) between India and Pakistan. The war also
involved a limited participation from the countries' respective air
forces. This war saw the largest amassing of troops in Kashmir, a number
that was overshadowed only during the 2001-2002 military standoff
between India and Pakistan during which over a million troops were
placed in combat positions in the region. Many details of this war, like
those of most Indo-Pakistani Wars, remain unclear and riddled with media
biases.
1. Pre War Escalation
 |
| A declassified US State
Department telegram that confirms the existence of hundreds of
"infiltrators" in the Indian state of Jammu and
Kashmir. Dated during the events running up to the 1965 war. |
Fighting broke out between
India and Pakistan in an area known as the Rann of Kutch, a barren
region in the Indian state of Gujarat. Initially involving the border
police from both nations, the disputed area soon witnessed intermittent
skirmishes between the countries' armed forces firstly on March 20 and
again in April 1965. In June the same year, British Prime Minister
Harold Wilson successfully persuaded both countries to end hostilities
and set up a tribunal to resolve the dispute. The verdict which came
later in 1968, saw Pakistan gaining only 350 square miles (900 km˛) of
the Rann of Kutch of its original claim of 3500 sq miles.
After its successes in the
Rann of Kutch, Pakistan, under the leadership of General Ayub Khan is
said to have believed that the Indian Army was unable to defend itself
against a quick military campaign in the disputed territory of Kashmir,
following a loss to China in 1962.
Pakistan believed that the population of Kashmir was generally
discontented with Indian rule and that a resistance movement could be
ignited by a few infiltrating saboteurs. This was codenamed Operation
Gibraltar. For its part, Pakistan claimed to have been concerned by
the attempts of India to absorb Kashmir - a state that Pakistan claims
as "disputed", into the Indian union by way Articles 356 and
357 of the Indian Constitution allowing the President of India to
declare President's Rule in the disputed state. Pakistan was taken aback
by the lack of military and moral support by the United States, an ally
with whom the country had signed an Agreement of Cooperation. The United
States refused to come to Pakistan's aid and declared its neutrality in
the war by cutting off military supplies to both sides.
2. The War
 |
| Ichhogil Canal Picture taken
during 1965 Indo-Pak War. |
On August 15, 1965, Indian
forces crossed the ceasefire line and launched an attack on Pakistan
administered Kashmir, marking an official beginning to the war.
Pakistani reports cite this attack as unprovoked. Indian reports cite
the attack as a response to a tip the Indian forces received from
Kashmiri civilians about Pakistani soldiers crossing the Line of Control
(LoC) dressed as local Kashmiris.
Most of the war was fought on land by each country's infantry and
armored units, with substantial backing from their air forces.
Initially, the Indian Army met with considerable success in the northern
sector (Kashmir). After launching a prolonged artillery barrage against
Pakistan, India was able to capture three important mountain positions.
However, by the end of the month both sides were on even footing as
Pakistan had made progress in areas such as Tithwal, Uri and Punch and
India had gains in Pakistan Administered Kashmir (Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
Occupied Kashmir), having captured the Haji Pir Pass eight kilometers
inside Pakistani territory.
These territorial gains
and rapid Indian advances were met with a counterattack by Pakistan in
the southern sector (Punjab) where Indian forces, having been caught
unprepared, faced technically superior Pakistani tanks and suffered
heavy losses. India then called in its air force to target the Pakistani
attack in the southern sector. The next day, Pakistan retaliated,
initialising its air force to retaliate against Indian forces and air
bases in both Kashmir and Punjab. India crossed the International Border
(IB) on the Western front on September 6 (some officially claim this to
be the beginning of the war). On September 6, the 15th Infantry Division
of the Indian Army, under World War II veteran Major General Prasad
battled a massive counterattack by Pakistan near the west bank of the
Ichhogil Canal (BRB Canal), which was a de facto border of India
and Pakistan. The General's entourage itself was ambushed and he was
forced to flee his vehicle. A second, this time successful, attempt to
cross over the Ichhogil Canal was made through the bridge in the village
of Barki, just east of Lahore.
This brought the Indian Army within the range of Lahore International
Airport, and as result the United States requested a temporary ceasefire
to allow it to evacuate its citizens in Lahore.
The same day, a counter
offensive consisting of an armored division and infantry division
supported by Pakistan Air Force Sabres rained down on the Indian 15th
Division forcing it to withdraw to its starting point. On the days
following September 9, both nations' premiere formations were routed in
unequal battles. India's 1st Armored Division, labelled the "pride
of the Indian Army", launched an offensive towards Sialkot .
The Division divided itself into two prongs and came under heavy
Pakistani tank fire at Taroah and was forced to withdraw. Similarly,
Pakistan's pride, the 1st Armored Division, pushed an offensive towards
Khemkaran with the intent to capture Amritsar (a major city in Punjab,
India) and the bridge on River Beas to Jalandhar. The Pakistani 1st
Armored Division never made it past Khem Karan and by the end of
September 10 lay disintegrated under the defences of the Indian 4th
Mountain Division at what is now known as the Battle of Asal Uttar
(Real Answer). The area became known as 'Patton Nagar' (Patton Town) as
Pakistan lost/abandoned nearly 100 tanks mostly Patton tanks obtained
from the United States.
The war was heading for a
stalemate, with both nations holding territory of the other. The Indian
army suffered 3,000 battlefield deaths, while Pakistan suffered 3,800.
The Indian army was in possession of 710 mile˛ (1,840 km˛) of
Pakistani territory and the Pakistan army held 210 mile˛ (545 km˛) of
Indian territory, mostly in Chumb in the northern sector.
2.1 Naval War
 |
| A map of Kashmir shows the 1949
ceasefire line, Pakistan Administered Kashmir and Indian Jammu
and Kashmir. Sectors of active conflict during the 1965 war such
as Chumb are also shown. |
The navies of both India
and Pakistan played no prominent role in the war of 1965. On September
7, a flotilla of the Pakistani Navy carried out a bombardment of the
coastal Indian town and radar station of Dwarka under the name of
Operation Dwarka, which was 200 miles (300 km) south of the Pakistani
port of Karachi.
There was no immediate retaliatory response from India. Later, the
Indian fleet from Bombay sailed to Dwarka to patrol off that area to
deter further bombardment.
According to Pakistani
sources, one maiden submarine, PNS Ghazi kept the Indian Navy's aircraft
carrier besieged in Bombay throughout the war. Indian sources claim that
it was not their intention to get into a naval conflict with Pakistan,
but to restrict the war to a land-based conflict.
Further south towards
Bombay, there were reports of underwater attacks by the Indian Navy
against what they suspected were American-supplied Pakistani submarines,
but this was never confirmed.
2.2 Covert operations
There were a couple of
covert operations launched by the Pakistan Army to infiltrate Indian
airbases and sabotage them. The SSG (Special Services Group) commandos
were parachuted into enemy territory and, according to the then Chief of
Army Staff General Musa Khan, more than 180 commandos penetrated the
enemy territory for this purpose. Indian sources however claim as many
as 800-900 commandos were airdropped, though the figure is probably for
the whole war. Given that most of the Indian targets (Halwara, Pathankot
and Adampur) were deep into enemy territory only 11-15 commandos made it
back alive and the stealth operation proved ineffective. Of those
remaining, 136 were taken prisoner, and 22 were killed in encounters
with the army, police or the civilians. The daring attempt proved to be
a disaster with the Commander of the operations, Major Khalid Butt also
being arrested.
3. Losses
India and Pakistan hold
widely divergent claims on the damage they have inflicted on each other
and the amount of damage suffered by them. The following summarizes each
nation's claims.
|
Indian claims |
Pakistani claims |
Independent sources |
| Casualties |
- |
- |
3000 Indian
soldiers, 3800 Pakistani soldiers |
| Aircraft destroyed |
35 IAF, 73 PAF |
19 PAF, 104 IAF |
20 PAF aicraft |
| Aerial victories |
13 |
30 |
- |
| Tanks destroyed |
128 Indian tanks,
300-350 Pakistani tanks |
165 Pakistan tank, ??
Indian tanks |
200 Pakistani tanks |
| Land area won |
1,500 mi2
(2,400 km2) of Pakistani territory |
2,000 mi˛ (3,000
km˛) of Indian territory |
India held 710 mi˛
(1,840 km˛) of Pakistani territory and Pakistan held 210 mi˛
(545 km˛) of Indian territory |
There have been only a few
neutral assessments of the damages of the war. In the opinion of
GlobalSecurity.org, "The losses were relatively heavy - on the
Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's
army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of
the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat
for Pakistan."
4. Ceasefire
On September 22, the
United Nations Security Council unanimously passed a resolution that
called for an unconditional ceasefire from both nations. The war ended
the following day. The Soviet Union, led by Premier Alexey Kosygin,
brokered a ceasefire in Tashkent (now in Uzbekistan), where Indian Prime
Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri and Pakistani President Ayub Khan signed an
agreement to withdraw to pre-August lines no later than February 25,
1966. The war remained largely inconclusive despite Pakistan suffering
relatively more losses, and saw a six year period of relative peace
between the two neighboring rivals before war broke out once again in
1971.
5. Intelligence
Failures
5.1 Indian
Miscalculations
 |
| Tanks of 18th Cavalry (Indian
Army) on the move during the 1965 Indo-Pak War. |
Strategic miscalculations
by both nations ensured that the result of this war remained a
stalemate. The Indian Army failed to recognize the presence of heavy
Pakistani artillery and armaments in Chumb and suffered significant
losses as a result. The "Official History of the 1965 War",
drafted by the Ministry of Defence of India in 1992 was a long
suppressed document that outlined intelligence and strategic blunders by
India during the war. According to the document, on September 22 when
the Security Council was pressing for a ceasefire, the Indian Prime
Minister asked the commanding Gen. Chaudhuri if India could possibly win
the war, were he to hold off accepting the ceasefire for a while longer.
The general replied that most of India's frontline ammunition had been
used up and the Indian Army had suffered considerable tank loss.
It was found later that
only 14% of India's frontline ammunition had been fired and India still
held twice the number of tanks than Pakistan did. By this time, the
Pakistani Army itself had used close to 80% of its ammunition. Air Chief
Marshal (retd) P.C. Lal, who was the Vice Chief of Air Staff during the
conflict, points to the lack of coordination between the IAF and the
Indian army. Neither side revealed its battle plans to the other.The
battle plans drafted by the Ministry of Defence and General Chaudhari,
did not specify a role for the Indian Air Force in the order of battle.
This attitude of Gen. Chaudhari was referred to by ACM Lal as the "Supremo
Syndrome", a patronizing attitude sometimes attributed to the
Indian army towards the other branches of the Indian Military.
5.2 Pakistani
Miscalculations
 |
| The main axis of the Indian
Offensive in West Pakistan. |
The Pakistani Army's
failures started from the drawing board itself, with the supposition
that a generally discontent Kashmiri people would rise to the occasion
and revolt against their Indian rulers, bringing about a swift and
decisive surrender of Kashmir. For whatever reason, the Kashmiri people
did not revolt, and on the contrary provided the Indian Army with enough
information for them to learn of "Operation Gibraltar" and the
fact that the Army was battling not insurgents, as they had initially
supposed, but Pakistani Army regulars. The Pakistani army failed to
recognize that the Indian policy makers would attack the southern sector
and open up the theater of conflict. Pakistan was forced to dedicate
troops to the southern sector to protect Sialkot and Lahore instead of
penetrating into Kashmir.
"Operation Grand
Slam", which was launched by Pakistan to capture Akhnur, a town
north-east of Jammu and a key region for communications between Kashmir
and the rest of India, was also a failure. Many Pakistani critics have
criticized the Ayub Khan administration for being indecisive during
Operation Grand Slam. They claim that the operation failed because Ayub
Khan knew the importance of Akhnur to India (having called it India's
"jugular vein") and did not want to capture it and drive the
two nations into an all out war. Despite progress made in Akhnur,
General Ayub Khan for some inexplicable reason relieved the commanding
Major General Akhtar Hussain Malik of charge and replaced him with Gen.
Yahya Khan. A 24 hour lull ensued, which allowed the Indian army to
regroup in Akhnur and oppose a lackluster attack headed by General Yahya
Khan. "The enemy came to our rescue", asserted the Indian
Chief of Staff of the Western Command. Many authors like Stephen Philip
Cohen, have consistently viewed that Pakistan Army "acquired an
exaggerated view of the weakness of both India and the Indian
military... the 1965 war was a shock". As a result most of the
blame was heaped on the leadership and little importance given to
intelligence failures that persisted until the debacle of the 1971 war,
when Pakistan was comprehensively defeated and dismembered by India,
leading to the creation of Bangladesh.
6. Consequences of
The War
The war had created a
tense state of affairs in its aftermath. Though the war was indecisive,
Pakistan suffered much heavier material and personnel casualties
compared to India. Many war historians believe that had the war
continued, with growing losses and decreasing supplies, Pakistan would
have been eventually defeated. India's decision to declare ceasefire
with Pakistan caused some outrage among the Indian populace, who
believed they had the upper hand. Both India and Pakistan increased
their defense spending and the Cold War politics had taken roots in the
subcontinent. Partly as a result of the inefficient information
gathering, India established the Research and Analysis Wing for external
espionage and intelligence. India slowly started aligning with the
Soviet Union both politically and militarily. This would be cemented
formally years later before the Bangladesh Liberation War. In light of
the previous war against the Chinese, the performance in this war was
viewed as a "politico-strategic" victory in India.
Many Pakistanis, rated the
performance of their military positively. September 6 is celebrated as 'Defence
Day' in Pakistan in commemoration of the successful defence of Sailkot
against the Indian army. Pakistani Air Force's performance was seen in
much better light compared to that of the Pakistani navy and army.
However, the end game left a lot to desire as Pakistan had lost more
ground than gained and more importantly did not achieve the goal of
occupying Kashmir, which has been viewed by many impartial sources as a
defeat for Pakistan. Many high ranking Pakistani officials and military
experts later criticized the faulty planning in Operation Gibraltar that
ultimately led to the war. The Tashkent declaration was further seen as
a raw deal in Pakistan though few citizens realised the gravity of the
situation that existed at the end of the war. Under the advice of
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan's then foreign minister, Ayub Khan had
raised very high expectations among the people of Pakistan about the
superiority - if not invincibility - of its armed forces, but Pakistan's
inability to attain its military aims during the war, created a
political liability on Ayub. The defeat of its Kashmiri ambitions in the
war led to the army's invincibility being challenged by an increasingly
vocal opposition. BBC And with the war creating a huge financial burden,
Pakistan's economy which had witnessed rapid progress in the early 60s,
took a severe beating.
Another negative
consequence of the war was the growing resentment against the Pakistani
government in East Pakistan. Bengali leaders accused the government for
not providing adequate security for East Pakistan during the war even
though large sums of money were taken from the east to finance the war.
Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was apprehensive of this situation and the need
for greater autonomy for the east led to another war between India and
Pakistan in 1971.